The Habit Of Identity :: essays research papers

<a href="http//www.geocities.com/vaksam/">Sam Vaknins Psychology, Philosophy, Economics and Foreign personal business Web SitesIn a famous experiment, students were asked to take a rotter home and to get employ to it. Three days later, they were able to oneness out their lemon from a pile of rather similar ones. They seemed to admit bonded. Is this the true meaning of love, bonding, coupling? Do we simply get used to other human beings, pets, or objects? Habit forming in humans is reflexive. We transplant ourselves and our environment in order to attain maximum comfort and intimately being. It is the effort that goes into these adaptive processes that forms a habit. The habit is in extended to prevent us from constant experimenting and risk taking. The greater our well being, the better we function and the durable we survive. Actually, when we get used to something or to someone we get used to ourselves. In the object of the habit we see a part of our history, a ll the meter and effort that we put into it. It is an encapsulated version of our acts, intentions, emotions and reactions. It is a mirror reflecting back at us that part in us, which formed the habit. Hence, the feeling of comfort we really feel comfortable with our own selves through the agency of the object of our habit. Because of this, we tend to confuse habits with individualism. If asked WHO they ar, most people will resort to describing their habits. They will impact to their work, their loved ones, their pets, their hobbies, or their material possessions. Yet, all of these cannot constitute part of an identity because their removal does not change the identity that we are seeking to seduce when we enquire WHO someone is. They are habits and they make the respondent comfortable and relaxed. notwithstanding they are not part of his identity in the truest, deepest sense. Still, it is this simple chemical mechanism of deception that binds people together. A mother feels that her off spring are part of her identity because she is so used to them that her well being depends on their existence and availability. Thus, any flagellum to her children is interpreted to mean a threat on her Self. Her reaction is, therefore, strong and enduring and can be recurrently elicited. The truth, of course, is that her children ARE a part of her identity in a fiddling manner.