Cognitive Psychology False Memory Essay

Theoretical and Applied/Practical Perspective of rancid Memory The human shop is theme to a multitude of errors, including semen misattri exceptions, torturing and creation of treacherously memories. In order to do jurist to this paper ane must first determine what is faithlessly repositing? False depot is memory for an evet that did not proceed or distorted memory of certain forces (Gleaves, Smith, Butler, & Spiegel, 2004). This type of memory has been an bea of utter nigh(prenominal) investigate interest for twain theoretical and practical reasons and psychologists all(prenominal)ow great been interested in memory illusions and distortions, as such errors preempt maintain theories of how the memory wee-wees (Hunt & Ellis, 2004). From a theoretical perspective, moody memories have been the subject of intense debates about the nature of human memory and a focal point for old and new memory theories. Memories ar not b bely stored and retrieved, education is encoded and memories are reconstructed using previous knowledge to paper together the situation as mavin thinks it occurred (Loftus & Ketchan, 1994). on that pointfore perception and light of ongoing events always brings related information to mind. For example, an item-by-item mentions that he/she had a great trip to the beach over the weekend. In comprehending what the individual is reflection unmatchable may imagine their last visit to Miami Beach. Later virtuoso remembers that the state individual mentioned his/her visit to Miami Beach when, in fact, the individual said nothing about which beach he/she visited. This example illustrates how frequently one might remember information related to ones ongoing perception and comprehension, even though the events represented by that information never occurred (Hunt & Ellis, 2004). One of the most common ways that rancid memories have been analyse is through the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) effect. This key out learning lo ok-alike provided a traceable means by which bogus memories can be created and studied in the research lab.Gallo, McDermott, Percer & Roediger III (2001) explained that the DRM paradigm was a method of using converging semantic associates to induce false memories. It fundamentally referred to the high confidence false bring forward or recognition of the exact seduce. Within the study subjects were given a list of speech for quick free abjure. These words were all associated semantically with a minute lure which itself was not presented. For example, if the critical lure was sleep the list would have consisted of cardinal words most highly associated with sleep such as derriere to the least highly associated which would be drowsy on free tie-up norms. Even though the critical lure was not on the list, subjects practically falsely floored it and on recognition tests, these individuals often remember these words with a high degree of confidence (Surgrue & Hayne, 2006).Fal se memories arising from phonologically associated lists may and so be enhanced by phonological convert in comparability with semantic encoding. False memories therefore can be elicited by presenting lists of phonologically related words in both recognition and recall tasks (Chan, McDermott, Watson & Gallo, 2005). jibe to the fuzzy traced theory (as cited in Howe, 2008), subjects encode both verbatim information about the become to gist information about the experience. Applied to the DRM paradigm gist information represents the semantic commonalities among lures studied associates, which pinch the fuzzy trace theory to propose that lure errors are familiarity shew (Arndt, 2010). Memory errors to unstudied items arise from how well they match gist traces and that memory errors are moderate by the extent to which unstudied items produce recuperation of verbatim traces. Therefore lure errors increase when they match the gists representation of their studied associates only if decrease when retrieval is inspired of the verbatim traces of their studied associates (Howe, 2008). erstwhile the gist representation is reasonably strong it can produce an unreal subjective experience of its actual presentation, this is known as phantom recall (Gallo, McDermott, Percer & Roediger III, 2001). When this phenomenon occurs an individual may confuse the gist trace strength with the mental experience of recollecting, which is normally mediated by retrieving verbatim traces of studied items. As lure items tend to match very strong gist traces in memory individuals believe they can recollect DRM lures. According to Arndt, (2010), this theory proposes that although these errors are often phenomenologically similar to items that were episodically experienced, lures recollection phenomenology is representationally distinct from that of study items (p.67). There is evidence however that false memory can be establish largely on automatic processing and is amenable to onl y limited conscious control.For example, Dodd and MacLeod (2004), showed that mere exposure to DRM lists was sufficient to create a false memory They presented DRM lists as coloured words in a Stroop test. label colours reduced accurate memory for list words as compared to reading coloured words, but false memory remained high for critical words. Furthermore, the elimination of false memory is difficult in that certain encoding manipulations may lead to reductions in false memories through metamemorial processes occurring at retrieval (Gallo, McDermott, Percer & Roediger III, 2001, p.339). For example slowing presentation rate decreases the probability of false remembering, but may not eliminate it (Gallo, McDermott, Percer & Roediger III, 2001). False memories are remarkably persistent. For example, Toglia, Neuschatz and Goodwin (1999) found that false recall rates remained high over a three-week period, whereas recall of studied words notifyed the typical decrement.In short, the DRM paradigm allows for the easy and accepted elicitation of false memories in the laboratory. From a practical perspective, false memories are a threat to the rigourousness of eyewitness testimony, a misleading showtime of autobiographical information in psych otherwiseapy, and a biased representation of littleons taught in educational settings. For this assignment the validity of eyewitness testimony only, will be discussed (Hunt & Ellis, 2004). According to Greene (as cited in Loftus, 1995, p.720), memories do not exist in a vacuum. Rather, they continually disrupt each other through a implement that we call interference. For instance, memories can be disrupted by things that an individual experienced earlier, this is known as proactive interference or situations that one may experience later, which is known as retroactive interference. Based on the interference theory from a retroactive interference perspective, when new information is received that is misleading in or so ways individuals make errors when they report what they saw.The reason for this is that new information often becomes incorporated into the recollection, supplementing or fixture it in a significant way (Porter, Bellhouse, McDougall, Brinke & Wilson, 2010). Elizabeth Loftus (as cited in Hunt & Ellis, 2004), pioneered laboratory research modeled on eyewitness situation demonstrating the intervening events that occur between witnessing an event and subsequent testimony in court. The paradigm for this research was simple, participants witnesses a simulated violent crime of an automobile accident half(a) of the participants received new misleading information about the event and the other half did not received any misinformation. The participants in this experiment were influenced by presuppositions invoked by the verbs smashed and hit based on the chief asked, which was most how fast the car was going when they hit, smashed each other . smashed presupposes a more violent collisio n a fact that influences both estimates of speed and amount of damage.Therefore individuals who stated that there was broken candy saw the word smashed, but no broken wish-wash was actually depicted in the film. The presupposition outstandingally, but subtly influenced memory for the actual event (Loftus, 1995). What was being remembered was the integrated memory of the two events, memory for the airplane pilot film, plus memory for the additional information that was inherent in the question asked later. As the two memories blended over time the end prove would be a single blended memory that is a distortion of the original event (Hunt & Ellis, 2004). Higham (1998), showed that the latency between exposure to misinformation and time recall also influenced the misinformation effect, such that recent exposure to recent information was associated with greater recall of false details. Therefore both the response bias and memory change accounts have important implications for how o ne might regard the reliableness of eyewitness testimony.According to Loftus & Pickrell (1995), false memories can be im pose as was demonstrated in the Lost-in-a-shopping-mall study. It suggested that memory of an entire mildly traumatic event can be created and that further questions may be asked, such as, is it practical to implant a memory of abuse. For example one of the most dramatic founts of false memory of abuse ever to be documented was the case of Paul Ingram from Olympia, Washington (Ofshe, 1992 Watters, 1991). This individual was arrested for minor abuse in 1988 at the time he was chair of the county Republican committee. From the outset he denied everything, but after five months of test, suggestions from a psychologist and continuing pressure from detectives and advisors, Ingram began to confess to rapes, assaults, child sexual abuse, and participation in a Satan-worshiping cult alleged to have murdered 25 babies (Loftus, 1993).Ofshe (1989) noted that this was not the first time that a vulnerable individual had been made to believe that he had committed a crime for which he originally had no memory and which evidence prove he could not have committed. What is crucial about the Ingram case is that some of the same methods that are utilize in reduce memory cases were used with Ingram. This case also provides further insights into the malleable nature of memory. They suggest that memories for in person traumatic events can be altered by new experiences. Moreover, they reveal that entire events that never happened can be injected into memory. Therefore false memories mountain chain from the relatively trivial (e.g., remembering voting) to the bizarre (e.g., remembering forcing ones daughter and son to have sex) (Loftus, 1993). These false memories, with more or less detail, of course, do not prove that repressed memories of abuse that return are false.They do demonstrate a mechanism by which false memories can be created, by a small suggesti on from a trust family member, by hearing someone lie, by suggestion from a psychologist, or by incorporation of the experiences of others into ones own autobiography planted (Loftus, 1993). Although false memories of ones childhood can be implanted, it does not imply that all memories that arise after suggestion are necessarily false, although the experimental work on false memory creation raises doubt about the validity of long buried memories such as repeated trauma, but it in no way disproves them. Even with the most experienced evaluator, it is difficult to score true memories from ones that are suggestively planted (Loftus, 1997).True memories represent events as they rattling occurred, whereas false memories shade, distort or entirely misrepresent events as they actually happened. Research on memory distortion indicates that memory is not at all like a mechanical recording device. The original experience is not stored as some veridical trace of what was out there but, rat her, is the result of interpretive processes of perception and comprehension. The intriguing picture of memory that emerges is one of a powerful, adaptively important and usually reliable psychological process that sometimes is completely wrong (Hunt & Ellis, 2004).ReferencesArndt, J. (2010). The role of memory activation in creating false memories of encoding context. diary of Experimental Psychology, 36(1), 66-79.Chan, C. K. J., McDermott, B. K., Watson, M. J., & Gallo, A. D. ( 2005). The importance of material-processing interactions in inducing false memories. journal of Memory & Cognition, 33 (3) 389-395.Dodd, M. D., & MacLeod, C. M. (2004). False recognition without intentional learning. Psychonomic bulletin & Review, 11, 137-142.Gallo, A. D., McDermott, B. K., Percer, M. J., & Roediger, L. H. III. (2001). Modality Effects in False Recall and False Recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27 (2) 339-353 Gleaves, D. H., Smith, S. M., Butl er, L. D., & Spiegel, D. (2004). False and recovered memories in the laboratory and clinic A review of experimental and clinic evidence. Clinical Psychology accomplishment and Practice, 11 3-28. Higham, P. A. (1998). Believing details known to have been suggested. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 920-930.Howe, L. M. (2008). What is false memory development and the development of comment on Brainerd, Reyna and Ceci (2008), mental Bullentin, 134 (5), 768-772. Hunt, R. R., & Ellis, C. H. (2004). Fundamentals of Cognitive Psychology (7th Ed). McGraw Hill.Loftus, E., & Ketcham, K. (1994). False memories and allegations of sexual abuse The legend of repressed memory. New York St. Martins Press.Loftus, E.F. (1997). Creating false memories. Scientific American, 277, 70-75. Loftus, E.F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories. American Psychologist, 48, 518-537. Loftus, E.F., & Pickrell, E. J. (1995). The formation of false memories. Psychiatric Annals , 25, 720-725.Ofshe, R. J. (1992 ). Inadvertent hypnosis during interrogation False confession due to dissociative state, misidentified multiple personality and the diabolical cult hypothesis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 40, 125-156. Ofshe, R. J. (1989). Coerced confessions The logic of seemingly irrational action. Cultic Studies Journal, 6, 1-15Porter, S., Bellhouse, S., McDougall, A., Brinke, T. L., & Wilson, K. (2010). A prospective investigation of the vulnerability of memory for authoritative and negative emotional scenes to the misinformation effect. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 42 (1) 55-61. Surgrue, K., & Hayne,H. (2006). False Memories produced by children and Adults in the DRM Paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 625-631. Toglia, M. P., Neuschatz, J. S., & Goodwin, K. (1999). Recall accuracy and illusory memories When more is less. Memory, 7, 233-256.Watters, E. (1991). The devil in Mr. Ingram. Mother Jones, 65-68.