'Globalization and Religion in Latin America Essay\r'

'Dr. Marian Cusimano Love’s argument on globalisation is very clear and straight forward as she pointed off the other side of globalization, which according to her creates substructureal crises â€Å"as existing states and regimes be having difficulties in make do with the challenges globalization brings” (p. 2). She contends that this difficulty creates and exacerbates brassal banquet. The institutional tornado according to the former is that term globalization is at fast pace, institutional responses is slow.\r\nThe problems move faster than the solutions to it and this can non be liked by some(prenominal) government alone evening by the loyalest state in the cosmea. However the indite’s emphasis falls on the institutional gap that exists between the gamy and hapless countries. Here, the reservoir rightly pointed surface the wide discrepancy of the rich and brusque countries in the sharing of the advantages of globalization. The spring a rgues that single the rich countries led by the United States mother intercourse the benefits of globalization as the realness economy is rule by Multinational Corporation, which yet cargons about dinero while the states seek wealth and development.\r\nThus, the author pointed out that whether globalization is driven by international companies or by powerful states,” many observers decry the estimable basis of globalization is driven by an value-system of crass materialism and consumption, or western pagan imperialism” (p. 4) As the ethical issue widens, the author accent that today more than half of the world’s population are non getting any benefits of globalization, and sympathetic development is unfulfilled, sacred creation is destroyed, and human life is lost.\r\nThis emphasis clearly implies a strong course of action in favor of the poor spate or poor states that can non advance or protect their interest in the global economy. The author nota ble that this problem is looming and worsening as the world’s poorest population is suppuration which will nurture enhance the gap between the rich and the poor. The author’s discussion of the unequal sharing of the benefits of globalization calls for a unified response from rich countries on the growing ethical concerns between the rich and poor countries, because, after all poor people are also sacred creation.\r\n entirely as the author turned to religion to search for answer to the growing institutional and ethical crises brought about by globalization, it appears that this is not possible as the corporations and states are not only engines but are both engine and beneficiaries of globalization. In turning to religion, the author presented an entirely different emplacement from that of the states or corporation. The author noted that corporations view people as a source of profit while the state sees people as a field of operations to be governed or taxpayers.\ r\nReligion sees people not as an factor or a retainer or useful object, but a uncanny being created by God, therefore he must be independent. He has the right to share in the blessings, which is the product of economic development. The author argues, â€Å"Religious scheme has long been playing an active role in globalization” (p. 5), and can be a mediating institution in the institutional and ethical gap between the rich and the poor. I believed that the author is right in saying that spiritual organization â€Å"may have some advantages in responding to these institutional gaps, to help manage the problem of globalization” (p.\r\n6). Indeed, many religious foreign organizations are doing exactly these things. The author cited that there is already a course of action taken in coordination with the Roman Catholic bishops of Latin America and the Canadian Bishops Conference, which is a seminar on debt relief for heavily indebted(predicate) poor countries. This is important course of action because it proves that religious institution can indeed fulfill the caper of bridging the gap between the rich and the poor.\r\nThe Latin American Catholic bishops were coordinated for the conference for the reason maybe that many of the world’s poorer country is find in Latin America. It is where near of these ethical problems relating to benefit of globalization are generally put throughd. In bridging the gap by the Catholic church, the author pointed out that the US bishops and the United States Catholic church â€Å"may not be well equipped to bridge the gaps created by global problems” (P. 8) as US Catholic bishops are not quick to make decisions, and â€Å"many ontogenesis countries believed that globalization benefits the US at their expense” (p 8).\r\nI think these reasons are valid, as it has been mentioned in this report that the US along with other rich countries and multinational corporations are the ones who get m ost of the globalization benefits. But Catholic Church is a global institution with highly organized yet centralized leadership, which would be ideal in mediating or bridging the gap created by the problem of globalization. The Latin American Catholic Church can perfectly facilitates this bridging as the economy of most Latin American nation belongs to the third world economies.\r\nThey maybe fully know the whole order of business of bridging the gaps between the poor and the rich economies of the world. The author noted that the Catholic Church has over 2000 years’ experience as a global institution, which made the Catholic Church deserving of the task. Furthermore the author pointed out that â€Å"globalization brings institutional gaps, but the Catholic Church has rich, extensive networks and institutions, from schools and hospitals to parishes and social development agencies, which are not only service oriented but in it for the long haul” (p.8). Religion bridges the institutional gap of rich and poor by presenting preference visions of globalization, which is seeing people not as market, nor instrument but people of God that participate in the benefits of globalization.\r\nWork Cited Love, Maryann Cusimano. Bridging the Gap: Globalization and Religion, and the Institutions of the U. S. Catholic Church. ground forces: American Academy of Religions Conference, November 20, 2001.\r\n'